A judge ordered that X Corporation, previously known as Twitter, must pay a total of 1.1 million dollars in legal costs accrued by a number of the social networking site’s former senior executives.
Parag Agrawal, the former chief executive officer of Twitter, and Vijaya Gadde, a former top lawyer, directed the group’s legal team in convincing Delaware Chancery Court Judge Kathaleen St. J. McCormick on Tuesday that Twitter had broken its obligation to pay the legal costs associated with their work for the firm.
The ex-executives said that by refusing to pay the amounts despite the fact they were connected to inquiries into the activities of the social networking site, Twitter violated its own rules. When Elon Musk, a billionaire, acquired the business for the price of $44 billion last year, they were fired.
Due to his inability to pay Twitter providers for services like rent and consulting costs, Musk has been the target of several lawsuits.
Company representatives didn’t respond to an email seeking comment on McCormick’s decision on Tuesday right away. She presided over the court case involving Musk’s bid to have his $54.20 per share deal to purchase the social media company dismissed. In October 2022, he gave up trying to have the buyout declared invalid.
According to court documents, the business has reimbursed roughly 600,000 dollars of its debt but kept $1,158,427 in fees for attorneys’ work defending its previous executives in a congressional investigation into the impact of social media on elections in the United States, which required Gadde to testify before the House Committee on Reform and Oversight.
One of the business’s attorneys, Michael Blanchard, said that X executives had sticker shock after receiving the cost from Gadde’s lawyers, which they deemed to be quite unreasonable.
Also Read: Zoom Adds Features Like Document Editing in Bid to Compete With Microsoft
The expenses, as stated by Blanchard, were for a single day of testimony, not multiple years’ worth of dispute. Officials from X believed the proposal to be an absolute exploitation of the business’s legal obligation to compensate employees for work done on its behalf.
McCormick stated Delaware courts inclined in favor of allowing CEOs’ requests for legal cost reimbursement when connected to their representation of firms after considering the arguments. She claimed that she didn’t see any justification for departing from the usual in this instance.
I am a student pursuing my bachelor’s in information technology. I have a interest in writing so, I am working a freelance content writer because I enjoy writing. I also write poetries. I believe in the quote by anne frank “paper has more patience than person