California’s Senate Bill 680, aimed at holding social media platforms accountable for addiction and harm to child users, met its demise for the second consecutive year on Friday, despite efforts from state Sen. Nancy Skinner (D) to push it through.
The bill, which had gathered substantial opposition from the tech industry, would have empowered the attorney general and public attorneys to file civil suits against social media companies for intentionally incorporating addictive or harmful designs and algorithms. This could have resulted in penalties of up to $250,000 per violation along with litigation costs.
Last year, a similar measure was prematurely extinguished during California’s suspense hearing process, a phase where bills with significant fiscal implications are often terminated without extensive debate. This year, the Skinner bill faced a similar fate due to the state’s substantial budget deficit, even with State Attorney General Rob Bonta lending his support to it in late June.
Despite adjustments made throughout the legislative process in response to concerns raised by tech groups, the bill failed to gain traction. Critics within the tech industry argued that it infringed upon free speech and could compel social media platforms to either shut down or restrict important content for children.
One notable alteration early on was the narrowing of the right of action to exclusively the state attorney general and public attorneys, excluding parents from using social media platforms. Additionally, the bill extended the grace period for companies to be in a “safe harbor” from the law. Platforms that corrected problematic algorithms or features within 60 days of a quarterly audit would not have violated the law as per the latest version of the bill.
Furthermore, encrypted direct messaging services were excluded from the bill by Skinner. This decision was influenced by logistical concerns voiced by tech groups, as determining whether messaging features caused harm or addiction without compromising privacy proved challenging.
Even if the bill had passed, social media platforms were unlikely to relent in their opposition. The Chamber of Progress, a tech industry coalition, emphasized the legal uncertainties surrounding a new California children’s online privacy law, which is currently facing a court challenge. According to Jess Miers, counsel for the Chamber of Progress, “The federal courts’ skepticism toward the [children’s online privacy law] should be a warning light: If S.B. 680 becomes law this fall, California will once again find itself embroiled in an expensive legal battle over online expression.”
Also Read: Samsung Gains 6% on Reports It’s Joining Nvidia AI Suppliers
In summary, California’s attempt to hold social media platforms accountable for addiction and harm to child users has failed for the second year in a row. Despite efforts to address concerns and criticisms from tech industry groups, the bill faced intense opposition, ultimately succumbing to the state’s budgetary constraints and the complex legal landscape surrounding online expression and privacy.
I am a law graduate from NLU Lucknow. I have a flair for creative writing and hence in my free time work as a freelance content writer.