Your Tech Story

European Union

EU Investigating Facebook and Instagram Over Their Handling of Disinformation Ahead of the Election

EU Investigating Disinformation on Facebook and Instagram Ahead of Election

Leave a Comment / Facebook, News, Tech News / By

Facebook and Instagram owned by Meta Platforms are being investigated by the European Commission for possible violations of EU online content regulations. EU IT regulators have responded to concerns over misleading advertising and misinformation ahead of the elections to the European Parliament.

Worries Regarding Deceitful Activities

EU Investigating Facebook and Instagram Over Their Handling of Disinformation Ahead of the Election

Image Source: communicationstoday.co.in

Growing worries regarding the dissemination of false information from both internal and external sources are reflected in the actions taken by EU authorities. The EU is concentrating on combating dishonest activities within its borders, especially by political parties and organisations looking to influence voters with misleading material, as Russia, China, and Iran have been identified as possible suppliers of misinformation.

Authority for Regulation: Digital Services Act

The Digital Services Act (DSA), which mandates that large digital companies take more aggressive action against unlawful and damaging information on their networks, provides the basis for the probe. There are severe penalties for breaking DSA commitments; these fines can reach 6% of a company’s yearly global revenue.

Doubts Regarding Meta's Moderation

Margrethe Vestager, the EU’s digital leader, voiced concerns over Meta’s moderation methods, pointing to a lack of transparency and inadequate action in relation to misleading marketing and content moderation processes. In order to evaluate Meta’s compliance with the DSA, the Commission has started procedures. The investigation will concentrate on matters like coordinated inauthentic behaviour and misinformation operations.

Meta's Reaction

With more than 250 million monthly active users throughout the EU, Meta justified its risk mitigation strategy by emphasising the protocols it has put in place for locating and resolving threats on its platforms. The business said that it would be happy to work with the European Commission and share more information about the steps it is taking to reduce risk.

Particular Issues the Commission Has Raised

Ahead of the elections to the European Parliament, the Commission brought up a number of specific concerns, chief among them being the absence of a reliable third-party platform for real-time civic discourse and election monitoring. Furthermore, criticism has been levelled at Meta for its choice to phase down CrowdTangle, its misinformation-tracking tool, without a viable successor.

Next Actions

Five working days have been granted to Meta to notify the EU of the corrective measures implemented in response to the Commission’s concerns. The investigation’s conclusion will have a big impact on Meta’s business operations in the EU and potentially influence future laws that fight false advertising and internet misinformation.

In summary, The EU’s investigation into Meta over claims of misleading advertising and misinformation highlights the need for strong regulatory frameworks to protect the integrity of online material. In order to stop the spread of false information and preserve democratic values in the digital era, regulatory oversight is crucial given the growing influence that digital platforms have on public opinion.

 
EU Targets Apple iPad in Latest Digital Dominance Crackdown

EU Targets Apple iPad in Latest Digital Dominance Crackdown

Leave a Comment / News, Tech News / By

The European Union’s aggressive attempts to stop any anti-competitive activities among computer companies have resulted in the latest setback for Apple Inc.’s iPad. With the EU enforcing strict new laws as part of its Digital Markets Act (DMA), Apple has six months to make sure its tablet ecosystem conforms with a number of preventive measures.

iPad Adds to the Hit List for DMA

EU Targets Apple iPad in Latest Digital Dominance Crackdown

Image Source: channelnews.com

Although there was previously criticism of Apple’s iOS mobile operating system, App Store, and Safari browser, the addition of the iPad represents a major step up. EU competition commissioner Margrethe Vestager stressed the need for fairness and competition in the digital sphere, noting that iPadOS is an essential platform for many businesses to contact their clientele even though it does not satisfy all requirements.

Apple's Challenges: Getting Used to New Responsibilities

The EU’s judgement is a significant defeat for Apple. The IT giant now has to work hard to modify its operating system in order to meet a lot of new requirements. These include enabling customers to remove preloaded applications—a move meant to promote a more competitive environment—and downloading apps from sources outside of Apple’s ecosystem.

Apple's Reaction: Concentrated on Customers in Europe

Apple responded by restating its dedication to European customers and recognising the difficulties the DMA presents with regard to data security and privacy. The business is committed to providing its goods and services while negotiating the changing regulatory environment, whatever the obstacles.

DMA: Going After Tech Giants

Not just Apple is included in the DMA; six of the most significant IT companies in the world are included as well; these companies are known as digital “gatekeepers.” In addition to Apple, additional regulations and more monitoring are in place for Meta Platforms, Google, Amazon, and ByteDance, the owner of TikTok, in order to stop monopolistic activities.

Principal Elements of the DMA

The DMA forbade designated corporations from exploiting third-party data to compete with merchants, favouring their own services, or combining personal data across platforms as of March 7, when it went into full force. In addition, it requires users to be able to download apps from other platforms in an effort to promote a more consumer-friendly and competitive digital environment.

In conclusion,  As Apple and other tech titans wrestle with the ramifications of the EU’s Digital Markets Act, the landscape of the digital economy is undergoing a major shift. A healthy digital ecosystem in the European Union and elsewhere depends on justice, competition, and innovation, all of which are fostered by regulatory oversight, notwithstanding its difficulties.

TikTok Ban in Montana Blocked by Court as Free Speech Threat

TikTok Faces Intense Scrutiny and Possible Fines in the EU Over Child Safety

Leave a Comment / News, Tech News / By

TikTok, the popular social media platform owned by ByteDance Ltd., is under the spotlight as the European Union gears up for an investigation into its compliance with strict new content moderation regulations, particularly concerning the safety of minors.

Concerns Over Protection of Underage Users

TikTok Ban in Montana Blocked by Court as Free Speech Threat

The European Commission is set to launch an inquiry into TikTok’s adherence to the Digital Services Act (DSA), which empowers regulators to address content-related issues on major tech platforms. Amid worries that TikTok’s recent adjustments may not adequately safeguard underage users, the EU aims to assess the platform’s measures for protecting minors from potential harm.

Stringent Penalties and Regulatory Powers

Under the DSA, tech companies face significant penalties, including fines of up to 6 percent of their annual revenue, for non-compliance with content moderation rules. Moreover, repeat offenders risk being barred from operating within the EU. This signals a robust regulatory framework aimed at ensuring the safety and well-being of users, particularly children, in the digital sphere.

The impending probe into TikTok follows the EU’s first formal investigation under the DSA, which targeted Elon Musk’s X platform over concerns related to illegal content and disinformation. With a growing focus on scrutinizing major online platforms, including Meta Platforms Inc. and Alphabet Inc., the EU underscores its commitment to enforcing accountability among tech giants.

Dialogue Between TikTok and EU Regulators

While TikTok has refrained from commenting on the investigation, it acknowledges ongoing dialogue with EU authorities. The platform has been subject to inquiries regarding its efforts to protect minors, addressing concerns regarding mental and physical health risks, and evaluating the usage patterns of children on its platform.

Also Read: Meta Will No Longer Suggest Political Content to Users on Instagram, Threads

The EU’s scrutiny of TikTok and other major platforms signals a broader shift towards greater accountability and transparency in the tech industry. As regulators seek to mitigate risks and safeguard vulnerable user groups, such investigations set a precedent for enhanced oversight and regulation of digital platforms.

As TikTok faces the prospect of regulatory action by the European Union, the tech industry awaits the outcome of the impending probe. With the DSA empowering regulators to enforce stricter content moderation standards, the investigation underscores the importance of prioritizing user safety, particularly among underage users, in the digital landscape.

Europe

Is Europe in Danger of Losing EV Battery Race?

Leave a Comment / Story, Tech Story / By

According to a report by the European Court of Auditors (ECA), Europe is at risk of losing the global battery race due to various challenges.

These include limited access to raw materials, increasing costs, and tough competition. The report highlighted that the European Union’s efforts to achieve its climate goals, which heavily rely on the adoption of electric vehicles powered by batteries containing metals like cobalt, nickel, and lithium, may be hindered.

Europe
Image Source: finance.yahoo.com

The ECA, an independent external auditor of the EU, stated that nearly 20% of new cars registered in the EU in 2021 were electric.

Also Read: Microsoft notches record high valuation of nearly $2.6 trillion

With an estimated 30 million zero-emission vehicles expected on European roads by 2030 and a ban on new petrol and diesel cars by 2035, the demand for batteries will soar. However, the EU’s strategy has not adequately addressed its ability to meet this growing battery demand.

Annemie Turtelboom, who led the ECA audit, expressed concerns about the EU’s ambition to become a global battery powerhouse, emphasizing that the odds of success are not favorable.

Turtelboom warned that if the EU fails to produce enough batteries domestically, it may either miss its emissions goals for 2035 or rely heavily on imported batteries, which could harm European industry and come at high costs from other countries.

The EU’s reliance on a few countries for raw materials poses a significant risk. The ECA highlighted that, on average, the EU imports 78% of five key materials. This concentration of supply brings geopolitical risks and potential shortages.

Turtelboom emphasized that the EU should avoid becoming as dependent on batteries as it is on natural gas from Russia.

The report revealed that a significant portion of the world’s cobalt comes from the Democratic Republic of Congo, while China dominates global battery production capacity and supplies 40% of natural graphite.

The EU relies entirely on imports of refined lithium. Although extraction in Europe is possible, it will take considerable time, with Portugal, holding the bloc’s largest lithium reserves, not expecting production to begin until 2026.

Furthermore, the ECA identified that the EU lags behind in terms of cost competitiveness, partly due to high energy prices. The EU Commission’s data was found to be outdated and incomplete, and public funding for battery projects remains uncoordinated, leading to overlaps and inefficiencies.

Also Read: Netflix Tudum 2023: Everything Announced

In summary, the report from the European Court of Auditors raises concerns about Europe ability to become a global battery powerhouse. Limited access to raw materials, rising costs, intense competition, and an inadequate strategy pose challenges to the EU’s ambitions.

The report warns that failure to address these issues could result in missed climate goals or heavy reliance on imported batteries, which would harm European industry and come at a high price.

Apple Pay

EU antitrust regulators seeking more info on Apple Pay

Leave a Comment / News, Tech News / By

The European Commission announced on Wednesday that EU antitrust investigators are searching for additional details on Apple’s smartphone payment system, Apple Pay. This is an indication that the regulator is trying to plug any gaps in its allegations against the iPhone manufacturer.

Apple Pay
Image Source: thehindu.com

A year ago, the EU antitrust authority alleged Apple conspired to make it hard for its competitors to establish competing solutions for Apple devices by limiting their access to its tap-and-go Near-Field Communication (NFC) technology, which is utilized for mobile wallets.

Also Read: Apple launches ‘buy now, pay later’ service in the US

“We can confirm the sending of requests for information,” a commission spokesperson said while declining to provide details.

Apple opted not to respond.

Apple has already mentioned the popularity of PayPal within its iOS smartphone OS as an alternative for users, along with rival MobilePay from Denmark, Swish from Sweden, as well as Payconiq from Belgium.

complainant Vipps and a mobile payment app from Norway claimed that NFC options are inefficient and uncompetitive.

It is rare for the commission to ask competitors and retailers for material now, three months afterward, Apple justified itself in an inquiry on February 14.

Following such hearings, the regulator normally makes its decision. If proven guilty of breaking antitrust regulations, the agency has the power to penalize Apple a maximum of ten percent of the company’s worldwide revenue.

Apple also debuted the “buy now, pay later” (BNPL) scheme in the United States in March, posing an imminent danger to the fintech industry, which is currently dominated by companies like Affirm Holdings as well as the Swedish payment provider Klarna.

With its “buy now, pay later” support, Apple is attempting to enter the loan industry. As a result, the corporation has established guidelines regarding how it will accept transactions. If you’ve been a loyal client in the past, this is one important consideration.

The Apple Pay Later service, which was introduced a year ago but is still under testing, will assess consumers based on their purchasing patterns in addition to which Apple products they now own.

Also Read: What is Apple’s rapid security response?

The service, which enables users to make purchases and spread-out payments over time, will also check to see if users have applied for an Apple Card credit card or any additional cards, they have associated with their Apple Pay account.

According to the firm, Apple Pay Later will enable customers to split expenditures into four installments spaced out over six weeks without any interest or fees. It will first be made available to a small number of users to bring it out to everyone in the upcoming months.

Data Act

Does the EU draft Data Act put trade secrets at risk?

Leave a Comment / Story, Tech Story / By

German engineering giant Siemens and German business software firm SAP have joined American IT juggernauts in denouncing new EU legislation on the use of data produced by consumer goods and other smart devices. Before the Data Act can be enacted as law, EU member states and EU legislators are working on its specifics.

Data Act
Image Source: economictimes.indiatimes.com

The proposed law, which addresses corporate and consumer data from the EU, is one of several pieces of legislation designed to restrain the influence of American tech titans and aid the EU in achieving its digital and environmental goals.

The proposed rule has drawn criticism from the United States for being overly onerous, and German businesses have voiced concern that a section requiring corporations to exchange data with third parties in order to supply aftermarket or related data-driven services could jeopardize trade secrets.

Also Read: What is Apple’s rapid security response?

“It risks undermining European competitiveness by mandating data sharing, including core know-how and design data, with not only the user, but also third parties,” the companies warned in a joint letter to Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, EU antitrust chief Margrethe Vestager, and EU industrial chief Thierry Breton.

According to them, “effectively, this could mean that EU companies will have to divulge data to third-country rivals, particularly those not operating in Europe and against which the Data Act’s safeguards would be ineffective.”

The chief executives of the two firms, Siemens Healthineers, German medical technology company Brainlab, German software developer DATEV, and lobbying group DIGITALEUROPE were among the signatories to the letter, dated May 4, obtained by Reuters.

The letter urged that the list of devices covered by the law not be expanded and called for measures to allow companies to reject requests to divulge data where trade secrets, cybersecurity, health, and safety are in danger. The Commission acknowledged receiving the letter and stated that while it recognized the value of trade secrets, corporations shouldn’t exploit them as an excuse.

The Data Act does not seek to alter international or domestic trade secret laws. Trade secrets shouldn’t, however, be a justification for avoiding sharing data, said Johannes Bahrke, a spokesperson for the EU Commission, at a daily press briefing.

The EU draft Data Act is a proposed legislation aimed at regulating data access and use within the EU. While the Act primarily deals with personal data, it also has provisions that could impact trade secrets.

Also Read: Is advertising the future of streaming?

One provision of the draft Data Act requires companies to disclose certain information about their data processing activities, including information about algorithms used to process data. This provision could potentially put trade secrets at risk, as companies may be required to disclose proprietary algorithms that give them a competitive advantage However, the draft Data Act also includes safeguards to protect trade secrets.

For example, companies would be able to request that certain information be kept confidential, and there are provisions in the Act that limit the disclosure of confidential information to specific parties, such as regulators or courts.